Friday, August 31, 2012

Jeff Huntington

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Kent Williams

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Jason Juan

Thursday, August 23, 2012

>> Restoration gone wrong...


We admire people who have can-do, elbow-grease-type attitudes. If something's broke, why not fix it? Especially badly-damaged artwork. How hard can it be to just pick up a paintbrush and fix a fresco? Well, as it turns out — and as an elderly Spanish woman learned recently: pretty hard.
A couple of weeks ago, the Centro de Estudios Borjanos in Borja, Spain, received a donation from the granddaughter of 19th-century painter Elías García Martínez. At the time, the Centro knew of only one painting by Martínez in Borja — Ecce Homo, a fresco on the walls of the church of Santuario de Misericordia.
That's it above. The leftmost image is how the painting looked two years ago; the middle image is how it looked in July, when it was photographed for a catalog of regional religious art. The image on right is how it looked when the Centro went to check it out on August 6th after receiving the donation. Hmm.
The restored version is apparently the work of an octogenarian neighbor of the church, who, noticing the damage to the painting, took it upon herself to restore the painting "with good intentions" but "without asking permission," as culture councillor Juan Maria de Ojeda put it. It became clear to the amateur restorer — quickly, one imagines — that "she had gotten out of hand," and she confessed to local authorities.


Source:  gawker.com

>> Macabre, art?


As I search for artists to add to my collection, sometimes I wonder what the line between amazing creatures and gruesome monsters lies? Is there a line dividing ghastly images and art?
And although i don't have a particular incline for grisly images, I personally seem unaffected by what others might find horrifying. I enjoy the originality and the meaning some paintings might portray. Could just that be the line between?

Is a macabre image acceptable, if there is a reasonable meaning behind it? While if a dark portray, has no meaning or just a sexual or violent one, then be distasteful? And if one thinks, that dark art is only acceptable when it has a reasonable meaning, then is only art with a substantial meaning, art?

Sorry for this complex, philosophical post. But I am very eager to know what fellow art enthusiast think about this subject.






Macabre Definition: Disturbing and horrifying because of involvement with or depiction of death and injury: "a macabre series of murders"

Karl Persson

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Roberto Ferri


Hi

I am glad you have stumbled upon my blog.
My aim in this blog , is very simple; to share with you amazing artworks.
My format is simple, and amazing artist a day.
I sometimes also include comments or share articles, I find adequate to the blog.
There are plenty of pages and sites out there who feature artists, the only difference
in mine, is that I only feature what I consider AMAZING art.  My other personal regulation is featuring artists of today, thus I only feature artist who are alive.
I hope to feature traditional, digital and 3d artists, but I am open to other mediums :)
I hope you enjoy my blog, and feel free to leave comments, or send me messages.

"An artist a day, keeps monotony at bay"